According to recent report and analysis from the benefits consultant in Aon Hewitt, the average worker needs to save 11 times of his or her final working salary beyond Social Security payments, to pay for retirement at age 65. The estimate is based on the retiree continuing to maintain the same standard of living and takes accounts for inflation and post-retirement medical costs. Reports also indicate that delaying retirement to age 67 reduces the amount to 9.4 times pay, while retiring earlier, at age 62, increases it to 13.5 times pay.
This analysis examined the projected retirement levels for approximately 2 million employees at 80 large companies in the United States and found that most employees are not on track to meet the goal of 11 times pay, although many are doing a bit better than they were a couple of years ago.
Most full-career employees are on track to save 8.8 times their final pay, leaving a shortfall of 2.2 times pay, which is still an improvement from the shortfall of 2.4 times pay in 2010. Full-career employees are considered to having a potential career of 30 years or more with their current employer before retirement, and who are currently saving in their defined-contribution retirement plan, like a 401(k).
Essentially, workers need to work and save more to close the gap since we don’t expect employers to provide more generous contributions. Fewer than 30 percent of full-career employees are on track to achieve adequate retirement income, Aon Hewitt found. This low percentage is due to our economy that can’t generate these kinds of savings rates. “Sound financial advice” generally urges Americans to save more money for retirement than could be available in our financial system. In the past our economy has been built on the premise of continuing growth and expansion. We know there are limits to growth, and our nation is beginning to run up against them. This, I believe is the true essence of the problem. A small portion of workers may be able to save enough for retirement, as recommended by financial planners, but a macroeconomic analysis makes it clear that this is not advice that can be followed by the population at large.